Page 46 - Issue 71
P. 46
VOL.1 , ISSUE 71OL.1 , ISSUE 71
V ELITE
Panama Canal.
Consistent with this view, Trump’s attack on
the West was evident in his confrontational
approach to the EU, G7, and NATO.
During his second administration, Trump
imposed 10 to 20 % tariffs on EU members.
The U.S foreign policy towards the EU and
NATO members took a more critical and
increased intensity in demanding a share
burden in the defense budget, claiming that
Trump’s mentality and leadership style can the US was protecting Europeans who were
often be classified as “one-man policy,” more busy achieving welfare ambitions. This
which emphasizes unilateral action, increasing tension led the EU, in turn, to
including direct executive orders over take its safety precautions through
multilateral cooperation. rearmament, depending on itself and
In addition to his imposition of the increasing its defense spending from 1.9% to
principle of power over the principles of 5% by 2030.
international law and his character that
favors transactional diplomacy in which he
desires to achieve a deal that trades
something for another else, and that can
involve anything that comes to mind. Thus,
this article seeks to explain and analyze how
Trump defines American national interest in
his second administration and to what
extent these policies have altered principal
patterns in the international system and
international norms. All these mentioned policies and changes
took place only in the first 6 months of his
Adopting “America First” policy reflected
how Trump attempted to make major presidential term, and they do not even
changes in the international system. This account for all other changes that are taking
approach not only emphasized protectionist place in the international system. the most
policies that might lead to isolationist important challenge that can affect us in the
tendencies due to imposing tariffs on almost Middle East is if major rivals made a
every trading country, not to mention that “transactional” deal and reached a
they were essentially targeting China, but consensus that serves their interest and
also this approach favors American national harms ours, and this is not an unlikely
interest over international commitments and scenario.
alliancies. This can also explain the repeated
pattern of unpredictable policies.
47
