Page 41 - Issue 72

V O L .1 E L I T E ISSUE 72

seen as further proof of the systemic

suppression of information that challenges
hegemonic Western views. It reinforces a
narrative that even the most unfiltered of
technologies will ultimately be brought into
line with corporate and state interests.
This incident highlights a deep-seated
distrust in the neutrality of technology
developed by the Global North. While some
may see Grok's “free speech” as a potential
benefit, a critical analysis from a decolonial
perspective would view it as a double-edged
sword: as it can temporarily validate
marginalized narratives, but its ultimate

purpose and control remain in the hands of
those who benefit from the status quo.

The very act of an American corporation's
AI commenting on the plight of Palestinians
and being silenced underscores the ongoing
struggle for narrative control, making it a
powerful symbol of the digital-age extension

of Orientalism and Western hegemony.
This incident therefore demands not just a
technical fix, but a fundamental re-evaluation
of who controls the information landscape
and for what purposes in a world where
technology is a primary arbiter of reality.
In a world where the lines between political
truth, technological error, and corporate
interest are increasingly blurred, one must
ask: who truly benefits from an “Unfiltered
AI”, and at what cost to those whose truths 41
are deemed too inconvenient to be spoken?