Edited and translated by Huda Nada
On Monday, May 12, 2025, and under the patronage of Professor Dr.
Mohamed Sami Abdel Sadeq, President of Cairo University, and under
the supervision of Professor Dr. Hanan Mohamed Ali, Dean of the
Faculty of Economics and Political Science, the Center for Economic
and Financial Research and Studies organized a symposium titled “The
Future of the Dollar and the Fate of Globalization.”
Professor Dr. Adla Ragab, the
president of the Center for Economic and Financial Research and
Studies, opened the symposium with words of appreciation to the
audience, who attended both in person at the Faculty and online via
Google Meet. She warmly welcomed the distinguished guests: Professor
Dr. Gouda Abdel-Khalek, Professor of Economics at the Faculty and
former Minister of Social Solidarity and Social Justice, and
Professor Dr. Hassan Ali, Emeritus Professor of Economics at Ohio
University and Nile University.
She dedicated several minutes to
introducing them, highlighting some of their notable academic and
professional achievements. Dr. Adla then outlined the main themes of
the symposium: President Donald Trump’s policies and their
implications on the U.S. dollar, the future of dollar dominance:
Will it remain the leading global currency or be replaced by the
Chinese yuan, a European currency, or a unified euro?, the fate of
globalization and the potential disintegration of the bipolar global
system (U.S. and Russia).
Dr. Hassan began by thanking the
center, the faculty, and Cairo University, then welcomed the
attendees. He started his talk by discussing the current dominance
of the U.S. dollar, noting that over 60% of international
transactions are conducted in dollars, 20% in euros, and the rest in
other currencies. He added that central banks worldwide hold the
dollar as a reserve currency.
He outlined the characteristics a
currency must have to be considered a global reserve currency:
-
International trust and
economic/political stability: historically, the dollar was
backed by gold or silver.
-
High liquidity: the dollar is
widely accepted and easily traded globally.
-
3. Institutional and international
law: This is represented by international institutions and
central banks accepting the currency as a major part of their
reserves and using it in pricing goods and international
transactions.
-
Size and diversity of the issuing
economy: the U.S. has the largest economy by nominal value;
China leads by purchasing power (PPP), and second largest
economy by nominal value
-
Transparency and governance: the
U.S. Federal Reserve is among the most transparent globally. Its
chair is appointed for 14 years, protecting it from political
swings. The Fed also distinguishes itself from other global
banks in that the central bank is typically government-owned,
while the Fed is owned by commercial banks, which hold a 6%
stake in it.
-
Safe haven status: in times of
crisis, investors flock to the dollar.
-
Free convertibility: the dollar
can be freely exchanged anywhere in the world.
In answering the question, “Why is the
U.S. keen for the dollar to remain the world’s reserve currency?”,
Dr. Hassan explained that printing a $100 dollar costs only about 40
cents. Around 52% of U.S. dollars are held and circulated outside
the United States, generating pure profit for the American economy.
This economic advantage makes the U.S. unlikely to give up its
currency’s global role.
He referenced an article he wrote in
the U.S. in 2006, highlighting the core American problem at that
time: negative savings rates. Investment continued, but it was
funded by foreign surpluses, particularly from countries purchasing
U.S. treasury bonds. Even when savings improved to 7–8% of GDP, they
later declined again.
Trump, he noted, sought to correct the
U.S. trade deficit, especially with China, by imposing tariffs,
assuming this would fix the issue. However, Dr. Hassan rejected this
rationale, stating that low American productivity compared to
countries like China, which has a 44% savings rate, was the real
cause.
Professor Hassan Ali explained that
the dollar's decline is due to lack of confidence and economic
factors like rising US debt, financial instability, budget
non-compliance, and its use as a political tool. He warned that
using economic tools as political weapons weakens their future
utility.
He argued that the turning point for
the dollar’s credibility was its use in sanctions, which pushed
nations to explore digital currencies and alternatives like BRICS.
As a result, global dollar reserves dropped from 77% to 59%. Despite
this, the Chinese yuan remains marginal in reserve holdings (2.5%)
and will need at least 20 years to match the dollar’s dominance.
He predicted that globalization is
shifting toward regionalism, and concluded by criticizing Trump,
saying he brought out the worst in Americans and he is the worst
thing that has happened to America, and even to the whole world.
Joining via Google Meet, Dr. Gouda
responded to Trump’s slogan “Make America Great Again” with a famous
line from Umm Kulthum song: “You want us to go back in time! tell
time to go back.”. He emphasized that no American citizen today
combines earning, frugality, and productivity. And the U.S. fiscal
discipline is lacking. He linked this to Ibn Khaldun’s five stages
of state development, stating that America is in the fifth stage:
extravagance and waste.
He then addressed four main tools of
American economic dominance:
-
The dollar as a global reserve
currency.
-
SWIFT, society of worldwide
interbank financial telecommunication.
-
Tariffs, used to protect U.S.
interests and pressure rivals.
-
Trade deals, employed as
geopolitical and economic leverage.
On globalization, he noted a shift
over the past 80+ years from multilateralism to minilateralism
(limited partnerships), that the world is witnessing a transitional
phase, with the economic center of gravity moving east, marking the
dawn of an Asian century after the Atlantic one.
Dr. Gouda acknowledged that Egypt’s
economy is rent-based, relying on: Strategic rent, Natural resource
rent, Geographic rent, including the Suez Canal. However, he warned
that revenues from the canal may decline due to climate change
enabling new and shorter navigation routes between East and West. He
also referenced “enemies” in the region, including some Arab states,
calling them “frienemies”, who are attempting to create alternative
trade routes, posing a strategic threat to the canal. He asserted
that Suez Canal’s value as a strategic asset remains, but its role
as a mere shipping lane is diminishing.
He then moved on to discuss the
situation in America, explaining that the dilemma facing American
society is a lack of savings, a problem Egypt also suffers from, as
we import more than we produce. He also explained that everything
that happens in Egypt—economically, socially, and politically—is
linked to the US dollar, which calls for serious consideration of
severing the link between the Egyptian pound and the US dollar. He
also warned against opening the doors wide open to hot capital,
which could suddenly leave the country, as happened in 2022,
emphasizing the need to establish strict controls on this type of
investment. and ends his talk by thanking the audience.
Dr. Adla opened the floor for
questions from both the in-person audience and online attendees.
Highlights included:
● A question
was raised about assessing the economic value of the Suez Canal and
Emirati investments in the region. Can enemies influence them?
● Professor
Gouda responded that we must not entrust our affairs to foreigners,
emphasizing that developing the Suez Canal should not be done
through foreign entities. He emphasized that the strategic
importance of the Suez Canal as a waterway exists in the long term,
but its economic value as a purely maritime waterway has begun to
decline as a result of the long-term shifts taking place in the
global economy.
● Why do all
countries seek to produce the same goods despite differing needs and
resources?
Dr. Hassan emphasized economic integration over competition, which
suits a world with varied needs and capacities.
● Can
globalization truly decline when only the U.S. is stepping back,
while China and Europe remain committed?
The shift toward regionalism is due to global disruptions, wars,
supply chain crises, etc. According to Dr. Gouda, economic power is
still in transition, not fully shifted.
Dr. Adla ends the symposium by
thanking both speakers for their valuable insights and expressing
gratitude to the attendees.